BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//CalDiscovery//caldiscovery//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH DESCRIPTION:Discovered and maintained by CalDiscovery (https://caldiscover y.com). Event details belong to their publishers. Contains information fro m CalDiscovery\, which is made available under the ODbL 1.0. SOURCE:https://caldiscovery.com/sacramento-ca/src-3698.ics X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H X-WR-CALDESC:Discovered and maintained by CalDiscovery (https://caldiscove ry.com). Event details belong to their publishers. Contains information fr om CalDiscovery\, which is made available under the ODbL 1.0. X-WR-CALNAME:CalDiscovery - sacramento-ca BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Women's Council of REALTORS Board of Directors Meeting DTSTART:20260907T190000Z DTEND:20260907T203000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028579-1788782400-1788787800@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/womens-council-of-realtors-board-of-direc tors-meeting-5/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:YPN Committee Meeting DTSTART:20260908T180000Z DTEND:20260908T193000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028580-1788865200-1788870600@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/ypn-committee-meeting-7/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:FAREPA Board Meeting DTSTART:20260909T200000Z DTEND:20260909T210000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028581-1788958800-1788962400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/farepa-board-meeting-4/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Internship Program DTSTART:20260910T190000Z DTEND:20260910T203000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028582-1789041600-1789047000@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/internship-program-3/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:SAR Toastmasters Meeting DTSTART:20260911T153000Z DTEND:20260911T170000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028517-1789115400-1789120800@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:community DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/sar-toastmasters-meeting-16/2026-09-11/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:CFB Marketing & Fundraising DTSTART:20260914T200000Z DTEND:20260914T210000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028583-1789390800-1789394400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/cfb-marketing-fundraising-5/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:RAF Committee DTSTART:20260915T173000Z DTEND:20260915T183000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028584-1789468200-1789471800@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/raf-committee-5/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Global Round Tables DTSTART:20260915T190000Z DTEND:20260915T210000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028616-1789473600-1789480800@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z LOCATION:Sacramento Association of REALTORS®\, 2003 Howe Avenue\, Sacrame nto\, CA\, 95825 URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/global-round-tables/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Scholarship Fundraising Committee DTSTART:20260915T201500Z DTEND:20260915T211500Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028585-1789478100-1789481700@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/scholarship-fundraising-committee-12/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Grievance Committee DTSTART:20260917T160000Z DTEND:20260917T173000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028586-1789635600-1789641000@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/grievance-committee-4/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Buyer Lease Negotiation: Navigating Solar During the Home Purchase Process DTSTART:20260917T163000Z DTEND:20260917T180000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028615-1789637400-1789642800@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/buyer-lease-negotiation-navigating-solar- during-the-home-purchase-process/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Executive Committee Meeting DTSTART:20260917T173000Z DTEND:20260917T190000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028587-1789641000-1789646400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/executive-committee-meeting-10/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:BBQ for a Cause DTSTART:20260917T230000Z DTEND:20260918T020000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028522-1789660800-1789671600@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:food DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/bbq-for-a-cause/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:SAR Toastmasters Meeting DTSTART:20260918T153000Z DTEND:20260918T170000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028518-1789720200-1789725600@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:community DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/sar-toastmasters-meeting-16/2026-09-18/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:MetroList Training - Session 2 & Session 3 DTSTART:20260921T160000Z DTEND:20260921T223000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028588-1789981200-1790004600@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/metrolist-training-session-2-session-3-3/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Regional Meetings DTSTART:20260922T160000Z DTEND:20260922T163000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028553-1790067600-1790069400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/regional-meetings-22/2026-09-22/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:New Member Orientation DTSTART:20260922T160000Z DTEND:20260922T180000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028589-1790067600-1790074800@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/new-member-orientation-16/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:DEIFH DTSTART:20260922T173000Z DTEND:20260922T190000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028590-1790073000-1790078400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:food DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/deifh-3/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Committee Fair DTSTART:20260922T180000Z DTEND:20260922T193000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028607-1790074800-1790080200@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z LOCATION:Mack Powell Event Center\, 2003 Howe Avenue\, Sacramento\, CA\, 9 5825\, United States URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/committee-fair/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:From Burnout to Balance DTSTART:20260922T180000Z DTEND:20260922T193000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028654-1790074800-1790080200@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z LOCATION:Sacramento Association of REALTORS®\, 2003 Howe Avenue\, Sacrame nto\, CA\, 95825 URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/from-burnout-to-balance/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Mastering the 1031 Exchange DTSTART:20260923T180000Z DTEND:20260923T193000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028653-1790161200-1790166600@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/mastering-the-1031-exchange/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Board of Directors Meeting DTSTART:20260924T160000Z DTEND:20260924T180000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028591-1790240400-1790247600@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/board-of-directors-meeting-7/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:SAR Toastmasters Meeting DTSTART:20260925T153000Z DTEND:20260925T170000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028519-1790325000-1790330400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:community DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/sar-toastmasters-meeting-16/2026-09-25/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Preferred Partner Committee Meeting DTSTART:20260928T200000Z DTEND:20260928T210000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T061629Z UID:10028592-1790600400-1790604000@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T061629Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/preferred-partner-committee-meeting-5/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:New Member Orientation DTSTART:20260929T003000Z DTEND:20260929T023000Z DTSTAMP:20260903T120110Z UID:10028597-1790616600-1790623800@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260903T120110Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/new-member-orientation-17/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Regional Meetings DTSTART:20260929T160000Z DTEND:20260929T163000Z DTSTAMP:20260904T000125Z UID:10028554-1790672400-1790674200@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260904T000125Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/regional-meetings-22/2026-09-29/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Probate\, Trusts\, and Guardianships... Oh My! DTSTART:20260929T170000Z DTEND:20260929T183000Z DTSTAMP:20260904T120545Z UID:10028651-1790676000-1790681400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:food DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260904T120545Z LOCATION:Mack Powell Event Center\, 2003 Howe Avenue\, Sacramento\, CA\, 9 5825\, United States URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/probate-trusts-and-guardianships-oh-my/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:CFB Research DTSTART:20260929T183000Z DTEND:20260929T193000Z DTSTAMP:20260904T120545Z UID:10028593-1790681400-1790685000@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:education DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260904T120545Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/cfb-research-2/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:SAR Charitable Foundation Board of Directors [In-person] DTSTART:20260929T193000Z DTEND:20260929T210000Z DTSTAMP:20260904T120545Z UID:10028594-1790685000-1790690400@sacrealtor.org CATEGORIES:civic DESCRIPTION:Housing Statistics - July 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n July 2026 was a Seller ’s market. The number of for sale listings was down 1.4 percent from one year earlier and up 5.8 percent from the previous month. The number of so ld listings decreased 4.2 percent year over year and decreased 9.9 percent month over month. The number of under contract listings was down 2.6 perc ent compared to the previous month and up 6.3 percent compared to the prev ious year. The months of inventory based on closed sales was 2.4\, up 4.4 percent from the previous year. The average sold price per square foot was down 1.8 percent compared to the previous month and down 1.5 percent comp ared to last year. The median sold price decreased 5.7 percent from last m onth. The average sold price decreased 3.7 percent from last month. Based on the six-month trend\, the average sold price trend was neutral and the median sold price trend was neutral. The average days on market showed a n eutral trend\, unchanged compared to the previous year. The ratio of sold price versus original list price was 98 percent\, an increase of 1 percent compared to the previous year. The Sacramento County housing market\, inc luding West Sacramento\, remained in seller’s market territory in July 2 026\, though the month’s data reflects a seasonal softening in both sale s volume and pricing metrics that is typical of the summer period. Active listings increased 5.8 percent from June but declined 1.4 percent compared with July 2025\, bringing total available homes to 2\,408. The continued year-over-year inventory compression\, even as monthly supply grows\, unde rscores the structural supply constraints that have defined this market cy cle. Closed sales totaled 1\,023 transactions in July\, down 9.9 percent f rom June and 4.2 percent below one year ago. The month-over-month decline reflects typical summer seasonality\, though the rolling three-month sold total of 3\,180 remains 4.6 percent ahead of the same period last year\, p roviding important context for the single-month dip. Pending sales provide an additional forward-looking indicator of demand. Under-contract propert ies reached 1\,108\, declining 2.6 percent from June but running 6.3 perce nt above July 2025. The year-over-year gain in pending activity signals th at underlying demand remains stronger than last summer despite the month-o ver-month pullback. \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n View The July 2026 Full Market Summary \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \ n\n \n \n Market Statistics Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Zip Code Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Invent ory Count Report \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \ n \n Statistical Market Analysis \n \n \n \n \ n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Previous Housing Stats \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Historica l Data \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Category\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jun. 2026\n % Change\n Jul. 2026 vs. Jul. 2025 \n % Change\n May–Jul. 2026 vs. May–Jul. 2025\n % Chang e\n \n \n\n \n\n \n For Sale\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,276\n 5.8% up\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,441\n -1.4% down\n 2\,408 vs. 2\,44 1\n -1.4% down\n \n\n \n Sold\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,136\n -9.9% down\n 1\,023 vs. 1\,068\n -4.2% down\n 3\,180 vs . 3\,041\n 4.6% up\n \n\n \n Pended\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,1 37\n -2.6% down\n 1\,108 vs. 1\,042\n 6.3% up\n 3\,282 vs. 3\,088\n 6.3% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Sq. Ft. Price (Sold)\ n $333 vs. $339\n -1.8% down\n $333 vs. $338\n -1.5% d own\n $338 vs. $344\n -1.7% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Days on Market\n 33 vs. 28\n 17.9% up\n 33 vs. 33\n 0%\n 29 vs. 30\n -3.3% down\n \n\n \n Sold/Orig LP Diff. %\n 98 vs. 99\n -1% down\n 98 vs. 97\n 1% up\n 99 vs . 98\n 1% up\n \n\n \n Avg. Active Price\n $677\,000 vs. $706\,000\n -4.1% down\n $677\,000 vs. $687\,000\n -1.5 % down\n $697\,000 vs. $698\,000\n -0.1% down\n \n\n \n Avg. Sold Price\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $603\,000 vs. $626\,000\n -3.7% down\n $617\,000 vs. $618\,000\ n -0.2% down\n \n\n \n MOI (Closed Sales)\n 2.4 vs. 2 \n 20% up\n 2.4 vs. 2.3\n 4.4% up\n 2.3 vs. 2.4\n -4.2% down\n \n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n Residential\n 2 Bedrooms\n 3 Bedroom s\n 4 Bedrooms\n 5+ Bedrooms\n All Bedrooms\n \n \n \n \n Closed\n \n #Units: 194\n Dollar Value: $86 \,008\,529\n Avg List Price: $447\,465\n Avg Close Price: $4 43\,343\n Avg Market Time: 36\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,203\n % of List Price: 99.08%\n \n \n #Units: 556\n Dolla r Value: $300\,825\,404\n Avg List Price: $539\,251\n Avg Cl ose Price: $541\,053\n Avg Market Time: 34\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,5 42\n % of List Price: 100.33%\n \n \n #Units: 351\ n Dollar Value: $232\,073\,730\n Avg List Price: $662\,370\n Avg Close Price: $661\,179\n Avg Market Time: 32\n A vg Sq Ft: 2\,119\n % of List Price: 99.82%\n \n \n #Units: 74\n Dollar Value: $58\,624\,026\n Avg List Price: $805\,764\n Avg Close Price: $792\,217\n Avg Market Time: 53 \n Avg Sq Ft: 3\,043\n % of List Price: 98.32%\n \n \n #Units: 1\,175\n Dollar Value: $677\,531\,689\n Avg List Price: $577\,660\n Avg Close Price: $576\,623\n Avg Market Time: 35\n Avg Sq Ft: 1\,753\n % of List Price: 99.8 2%\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Pricing TrendsPrice indicators in July reflect a market cooling mod estly from its spring and early summer peaks. The average sold price regis tered $603\,000\, down 3.7 percent from both June and July of last year. T he median sold price measured $542\,000\, declining 5.7 percent from June and 3 percent below July 2025. Over a six-month period\, both the average and median sold price trends are categorized as neutral. The average price per square foot came in at $333\, down 1.8 percent from last month and 1. 5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend also categorized as n eutral. The average for sale price measured $677\,000\, down 4.1 percent f rom June and 1.5 percent below July 2025\, with its six-month trend catego rized as depreciating. Market Pace and Negotiation DynamicsHomes averaged 33 days on market in July\, up 17.9 percent from June but unchanged compar ed with July 2025\, reflecting a neutral trend in time-to-sale. The sold-t o-original list price ratio measured 98 percent\, down 1 percent from June but up 1 percent from July of last year. Sellers continue to secure prici ng close to original asking values\, and the year-over-year improvement in the ratio indicates negotiating conditions remain more favorable for sell ers than they were at this time in 2025. Inventory Levels and AbsorptionMo nths of inventory based on closed sales measured 2.4 months\, up 4.4 perce nt year over year and 20 percent from June as the slower sales pace relati ve to available supply pushed the metric higher. Inventory levels nonethel ess remain below the three-month threshold associated with balanced market conditions. Months of inventory based on pending sales measured 2.2 month s\, declining 4.3 percent year over year but up 10 percent from June. Abso rption metrics reflect the month’s softer sales pace. Closed-sale absorp tion registered 42.5 percent\, down 3 percent year over year and 14.8 perc ent from last month. Pending-based absorption measured 46 percent\, increa sing 7.7 percent year over year though declining 8 percent from June. Both absorption figures remain well above the 33.33 percent seller’s market threshold\, confirming that despite the monthly softening\, supply continu es to be absorbed at a pace consistent with seller-favorable conditions. M arket OutlookJuly data presents a market in a familiar summer pattern: sal es volume and pricing metrics pull back from spring peaks while underlying demand\, as measured by pending activity and rolling quarterly totals\, r emains ahead of last year’s pace. The month-over-month softening in abso rption and pricing should be viewed in the context of seasonal norms rathe r than a structural shift in market conditions. With months of inventory s till below three months and year-over-year pending activity running positi ve\, Sacramento County retains the characteristics of a seller’s market as it moves into the late summer period. Performance in the coming months will depend on how quickly the fall selling season activates\, along with the trajectory of interest rates and broader economic conditions. LAST-MODIFIED:20260904T120545Z URL:https://sacrealtor.org/event/sar-charitable-foundation-board-of-direct ors-in-person-6/ X-SOURCE-NAME:Sacramento Association of REALTORS® X-SOURCE-URL:https://sacrealtor.org/calendar END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR